Ramadoss(Minor) Through His Guardian Muthuramalingam vs Kannusamy Advocate - Mr.S.Arichanran — 41/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM090000522023
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
55/2023
Filing Date
01-11-2023
Registration No
41/2023
Registration Date
01-11-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramadoss(Minor) Through His Guardian Muthuramalingam
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Nagarajan Minor through his Guardian Muthuramalingam
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Respondent(s)
Kannusamy Advocate - Mr.S.Arichanran
Ganesh Boopathy
Adv. Exparte
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Service Pending
Amendment
Steps
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Service Pending |
| 09-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 17-03-2026 | Steps |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 04-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Order 22 Rule 3 of CPC to implead the legal heirs of the deceased 1st plaintiff (who died on 21.02.2025) as new plaintiffs in O.S. No. 41/2023 is allowed. The court found that allowing the petition is necessary to pass an effective decree and that respondents have no valid objections and will not be prejudiced. No costs imposed as costs were already imposed in a related earlier petition (I.A. No. 06/2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Order 22 Rule 3 of CPC to implead the legal heirs of the deceased 1st plaintiff (who died on 21.02.2025) as new plaintiffs in O.S. No. 41/2023 is allowed. The court found that allowing the petition is necessary to pass an effective decree and that respondents have no valid objections and will not be prejudiced. No costs imposed as costs were already imposed in a related earlier petition (I.A. No. 06/2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts