Magalingam vs Sappani Advocate - Exparte — 26/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM090000342024

Arguments

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

41/2024

Filing Date

04-10-2024

Registration No

26/2024

Registration Date

04-10-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1

Petitioner(s)

Magalingam

Adv. Mr.Y.T.Ansari

Respondent(s)

Sappani Advocate - Exparte

K.Pushpavalli

Adv. Mr.Ali akbar

M.Shanmugavalli

Adv. Mr.Ali akbar

Jothimurugan

Adv. Mr.Karthikeyan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

29-04-2026

Arguments

15-04-2026

Arguments

26-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Evidence

27-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

22-09-2025
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: O.S.No.26/2024 Hearing Date: 22.09.2025 Outcome: Case adjourned with cross-examination of witnesses continuing. The plaintiff's witness was recalled, sworn in, and cross-examined by defendants 2-4 regarding a property dispute involving survey numbers 327/9A1 and 327/9A2 in Kandulavil village. The court found the plaintiff's testimony deficient on several material points, including lack of documentary evidence and contradictions regarding ancestral property ownership and maintenance expenses. No re-cross-examination was allowed, and the hearing concluded at 11:45 AM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S.No.26/2024 Hearing Date: 22.09.2025 Outcome: Case adjourned with cross-examination of witnesses continuing. The plaintiff's witness was recalled, sworn in, and cross-examined by defendants 2-4 regarding a property dispute involving survey numbers 327/9A1 and 327/9A2 in Kandulavil village. The court found the plaintiff's testimony deficient on several material points, including lack of documentary evidence and contradictions regarding ancestral property ownership and maintenance expenses. No re-cross-examination was allowed, and the hearing concluded at 11:45 AM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case