Ganesan vs Kasinathan and 4 others Advocate - Mr.S.Arichandran — 100026/2015
Case under --- Section Order7Rule1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNRM090000282015
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
35/2015
Filing Date
03-03-2015
Registration No
100026/2015
Registration Date
03-03-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesan
Adv. Mr.K.Umashankar
Respondent(s)
Kasinathan and 4 others Advocate - Mr.S.Arichandran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Service Pending
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 11-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 07-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | Service Pending |
| 26-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition to amend the plaint was allowed by the District Munsif Court. The plaintiff's power agent sought to add a prayer declaring a settlement deed executed during the suit's pendency as null and void. Although the court acknowledged the late filing, it permitted the amendment to avoid multiplicity of litigation, but conditioned the allowance on payment of costs of Rs. 500 to the defendants by November 19, 2025, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition to amend the plaint was allowed by the District Munsif Court. The plaintiff's power agent sought to add a prayer declaring a settlement deed executed during the suit's pendency as null and void. Although the court acknowledged the late filing, it permitted the amendment to avoid multiplicity of litigation, but conditioned the allowance on payment of costs of Rs. 500 to the defendants by November 19, 2025, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts