Allimuthu vs Muthuramalingam — 3/2025

Case under Indian Museum Act Section 21. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Enquiry Next hearing 15-Apr-2026 this date has passed

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNRM090000272025

e-Filing Number

17-07-2025

Filing Number

31/2025

Filing Date

19-Jul-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

19-Jul-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Museum Act Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Allimuthu

    Adv. THAMEEMUN ANSARI Y

  2. 2.balakrishan

    Adv. THAMEEMUN ANSARI Y

  3. 3.suramai

    Adv. THAMEEMUN ANSARI Y

  4. 4.murukashas

    Adv. THAMEEMUN ANSARI Y

  5. 5.karuppanan

    Adv. THAMEEMUN ANSARI Y

  6. 6.muvantharan

    Adv. THAMEEMUN ANSARI Y

  7. 7.ravichandaran

    Adv. THAMEEMUN ANSARI Y

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muthuramalingam

  2. 2.Valavanthal

    Adv. Mr.K.Murugapoopathi

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  13. 19-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  16. 26-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  17. 19-Nov-2025

    Other wiseView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by Valavandhal (2nd respondent) under Order 21 Rule 106 CPC to set aside an ex-parte order dated 20.08.2025 is allowed conditionally. The court found that the petitioner had established sufficient cause for non-appearance due to illness and granted him a fair opportunity to contest the main execution petition. However, the petitioner must pay Rs. 500 to the respondents on or before 26.11.2025, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  19. 29-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  20. 22-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  21. 09-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  22. 22-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  23. 10-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  24. 01-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  25. 25-Aug-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  26. 20-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  27. 19-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 19-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Valavandhal (2nd respondent) under Order 21 Rule 106 CPC to set aside an ex-parte order dated 20.08.2025 is allowed conditionally. The court found that the petitioner had established sufficient cause for non-appearance due to illness and granted him a fair opportunity to contest the main execution petition. However, the petitioner must pay Rs. 500 to the respondents on or before 26.11.2025, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case