Sundari vs R.Sivasangarakumar through his Power Agent Thangapandian Advocate - Mr.H.Muralidharan — 100024/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1cpc. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM090000252016
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Date
06-02-2016
Registration No
100024/2016
Registration Date
06-02-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sundari
Adv. Tr.K.Velusamy
Respondent(s)
R.Sivasangarakumar through his Power Agent Thangapandian Advocate - Mr.H.Muralidharan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Stay
Stay
Stay
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 06-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 23-02-2026 | Stay |
| 16-02-2026 | Stay |
| 02-02-2026 | Stay |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif court allowed the petition filed by S.R. Ponnumani (2nd defendant) to reopen and recall plaintiff witnesses for cross-examination. The court held that although Ponnumani is a subsequent purchaser subject to the doctrine of *Lis Pendens*, he is entitled to fair opportunity to cross-examine plaintiff witnesses (PW1 and PW2) as a proper party to the suit, as he was impleaded only during defendant evidence stage. The petitioner must conduct cross-examination without causing unnecessary delays, given the High Court's directive to complete proceedings within 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif court allowed the petition filed by S.R. Ponnumani (2nd defendant) to reopen and recall plaintiff witnesses for cross-examination. The court held that although Ponnumani is a subsequent purchaser subject to the doctrine of *Lis Pendens*, he is entitled to fair opportunity to cross-examine plaintiff witnesses (PW1 and PW2) as a proper party to the suit, as he was impleaded only during defendant evidence stage. The petitioner must conduct cross-examination without causing unnecessary delays, given the High Court's directive to complete proceedings within 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts