ALAGUMARI vs VELU Advocate - Mr.N.Elangovan — 20/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM090000242023
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
27/2023
Filing Date
07-06-2023
Registration No
20/2023
Registration Date
07-06-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ALAGUMARI
Adv. Mr.Y.T.Ansari
Respondent(s)
VELU Advocate - Mr.N.Elangovan
Kumarayya
Adv. Mr.N.Elangovan
gandhi
Adv. Mr.N.Elangovan
mohammed malik
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 23-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 09-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 07-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by the 4th defendant (through his power agent) seeking rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 and Section 151 CPC has been dismissed. The court held that the petitioner's grounds—including allegations of fraudulent deed, non-joinder of necessary parties, improper valuation, and absence of cause of action—constitute questions of fact that must be decided at trial through proper evidence and cannot form grounds for outright plaint rejection. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by the 4th defendant (through his power agent) seeking rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 and Section 151 CPC has been dismissed. The court held that the petitioner's grounds—including allegations of fraudulent deed, non-joinder of necessary parties, improper valuation, and absence of cause of action—constitute questions of fact that must be decided at trial through proper evidence and cannot form grounds for outright plaint rejection. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts