Sownthiravalli and 8 others vs Petchiammal and one other Advocate - Mr.S.Periyasamy — 19/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM090000212022
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
26/2022
Filing Date
07-04-2022
Registration No
19/2022
Registration Date
27-04-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sownthiravalli and 8 others
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Bagavathi
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Rani
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Packiyavalli
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Pakciyam
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Indhumathi
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Manikandan
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Manimegalai
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Saranya
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Respondent(s)
Petchiammal and one other Advocate - Mr.S.Periyasamy
Muthuramalingam
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Amendment
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 08-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 01-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 25-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Order 22 Rule 4 of CPC to implead the legal heirs of the deceased first plaintiff was allowed. The court found that unless the petition was allowed, no effective decree could be passed, and rejected the respondents' objection that certain legal heirs were omitted, holding that plaintiffs cannot be forced to add parties and any failure is at their own risk. No costs were imposed as costs had already been imposed in an earlier application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Order 22 Rule 4 of CPC to implead the legal heirs of the deceased first plaintiff was allowed. The court found that unless the petition was allowed, no effective decree could be passed, and rejected the respondents' objection that certain legal heirs were omitted, holding that plaintiffs cannot be forced to add parties and any failure is at their own risk. No costs were imposed as costs had already been imposed in an earlier application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts