Maruthupandiyan vs Kaneeshwari Advocate - Mr.M.Dharmar — 10/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM090000132025

Filing Number

17/2025

Filing Date

28-Apr-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

28-Apr-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maruthupandiyan

    Adv. Mr.K.Alagarsamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kaneeshwari Advocate - Mr.M.Dharmar

  2. 2.Muniyasamy

    Adv. Mr.M.Dharmar

  3. 3.Thirunavukarasu

    Adv. Mr.M.Dharmar

  4. 4.Panjavarnam

    Adv. Mr.M.Dharmar

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  8. 10-Jan-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Other wiseView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif Court of Mudukulathur allowed the petition filed under Order 3 Rule 2(a) of CPC and recognized Gunavathi as the power agent of plaintiff Maruthupandiyan. The court held that spouses can depose on behalf of each other under Section 120 of the Indian Evidence Act, and since the plaintiff has secured employment in Singapore and duly appointed his wife with a power deed, the petition was allowed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  13. 08-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  14. 20-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  16. 10-Nov-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  17. 06-Nov-2025

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  18. 03-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  19. 22-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  20. 08-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  21. 13-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  22. 01-Sep-2025

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif

  23. 04-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  24. 28-Jul-2025

    Batta

    District Munsif

  25. 24-Jul-2025

    Batta

    District Munsif

  26. 10-Jul-2025

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif

  27. 03-Jul-2025

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif

  28. 23-Jun-2025

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif

  29. 18-Jun-2025

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif

  30. 06-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  31. 28-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 28-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court of Mudukulathur allowed the petition filed under Order 3 Rule 2(a) of CPC and recognized Gunavathi as the power agent of plaintiff Maruthupandiyan. The court held that spouses can depose on behalf of each other under Section 120 of the Indian Evidence Act, and since the plaintiff has secured employment in Singapore and duly appointed his wife with a power deed, the petition was allowed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case