Maruthupandiyan vs Kaneeshwari Advocate - Mr.M.Dharmar — 10/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM090000132025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
17/2025
Filing Date
28-04-2025
Registration No
10/2025
Registration Date
28-04-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maruthupandiyan
Adv. Mr.K.Alagarsamy
Respondent(s)
Kaneeshwari Advocate - Mr.M.Dharmar
Muniyasamy
Adv. Mr.M.Dharmar
Thirunavukarasu
Adv. Mr.M.Dharmar
Panjavarnam
Adv. Mr.M.Dharmar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Service Pending
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 23-02-2026 | Service Pending |
| 09-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif Court of Mudukulathur allowed the petition filed under Order 3 Rule 2(a) of CPC and recognized Gunavathi as the power agent of plaintiff Maruthupandiyan. The court held that spouses can depose on behalf of each other under Section 120 of the Indian Evidence Act, and since the plaintiff has secured employment in Singapore and duly appointed his wife with a power deed, the petition was allowed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif Court of Mudukulathur allowed the petition filed under Order 3 Rule 2(a) of CPC and recognized Gunavathi as the power agent of plaintiff Maruthupandiyan. The court held that spouses can depose on behalf of each other under Section 120 of the Indian Evidence Act, and since the plaintiff has secured employment in Singapore and duly appointed his wife with a power deed, the petition was allowed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts