Jeyaraj through power agent Arul Joseph David vs Manikkam Advocate - Mr.Y.T.Ansari — 10/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM090000122024

Trial

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

Filing Number

12/2024

Filing Date

26-02-2024

Registration No

10/2024

Registration Date

26-02-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7
Ia/9/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Jeyaraj through power agent Arul Joseph DavidJoseph Rani

Petitioner(s)

Jeyaraj through power agent Arul Joseph David

Adv. R. Balaji

Respondent(s)

Manikkam Advocate - Mr.Y.T.Ansari

Joseph Rani

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

30-03-2026

Trial

23-03-2026

Trial

18-03-2026

Trial

11-03-2026

Trial

07-03-2026

Issues

Interim Orders

12-06-2025
Other wise
12-06-2025
Other wise
13-11-2025
Other wise
05-01-2026
Other wise

Summary: The petition filed by Josephrani (2nd defendant) under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code to appoint an advocate commissioner was allowed. The court appointed advocate S. Pooja as commissioner to inspect the suit property, document its physical features with the help of a Taluk surveyor, and file a report and plan to assist in resolving the dispute regarding alleged encroachments and the relief of recovery of possession and mandatory injunction sought by the plaintiff. The commissioner fee of Rs. 6,000 was fixed, with Rs. 3,000 to be paid by the petitioner at inspection and Rs. 3,000 at report submission; the next hearing is scheduled for 05.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Josephrani (2nd defendant) under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code to appoint an advocate commissioner was allowed. The court appointed advocate S. Pooja as commissioner to inspect the suit property, document its physical features with the help of a Taluk surveyor, and file a report and plan to assist in resolving the dispute regarding alleged encroachments and the relief of recovery of possession and mandatory injunction sought by the plaintiff. The commissioner fee of Rs. 6,000 was fixed, with Rs. 3,000 to be paid by the petitioner at inspection and Rs. 3,000 at report submission; the next hearing is scheduled for 05.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case