Kalidass vs Asharap Ali — 12/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 and O7 R1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM090000122023

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

12/2023

Filing Date

03-03-2023

Registration No

12/2023

Registration Date

07-03-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 and O7 R1
Ia/7/2025 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section Kalidass
Ia/8/2026 Classification : Impleading Petition Section KalidassAsharap Ali
Ia/9/2026 Classification : Amendment Petition Section KalidassKamarutheen

Petitioner(s)

Kalidass

Adv. Thiru.A.Selvaraj

Respondent(s)

Asharap Ali

Kamarutheen

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

30-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

18-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

15-04-2026

Service Pending

26-03-2026

Amendment

12-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

09-06-2025
Other wise

Summary: The petition filed under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC to restore suit O.S.No.12/2023 (dismissed for default on 08.12.2023) was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff's failure to appear was not willful or wanton, as he was unable to contact his advocate due to ill health, and he filed the restoration petition within the prescribed period showing readiness to proceed. The court granted the petition on payment of costs of Rs. 500 by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent on or before 12.06.2025 to compensate for hardship caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC to restore suit O.S.No.12/2023 (dismissed for default on 08.12.2023) was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff's failure to appear was not willful or wanton, as he was unable to contact his advocate due to ill health, and he filed the restoration petition within the prescribed period showing readiness to proceed. The court granted the petition on payment of costs of Rs. 500 by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent on or before 12.06.2025 to compensate for hardship caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case