LINGAM V vs VIJAYA GOWRI L — 269/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNRM080047112024

e-Filing Number

08-08-2024

Filing Number

4696/2024

Filing Date

08-Aug-2024

Registration No

269/2024

Registration Date

23-Aug-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mudukulathur

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LINGAM V

    Adv. Thiru.K.Mangalanathan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYA GOWRI L

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 26-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 16-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 05-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 04-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 30-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 29-Nov-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case No.: STC.No.269/2024 Date: 29.11.2024 The witness re-appeared in court and underwent cross-examination by the opposing counsel on 29 November 2024. The cross-examination proceedings were recorded in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness provided detailed testimony regarding his professional background as a lawyer, financial details including bank accounts and income tax returns, property ownership, and circumstances surrounding an alleged loan transaction of Rs. 8,75,000 provided to the defendant during an engagement celebration in April 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  29. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 07-Oct-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  34. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 23-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 08-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 269/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case No.: STC.No.269/2024 Date: 29.11.2024 The witness re-appeared in court and underwent cross-examination by the opposing counsel on 29 November 2024. The cross-examination proceedings were recorded in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness provided detailed testimony regarding his professional background as a lawyer, financial details including bank accounts and income tax returns, property ownership, and circumstances surrounding an alleged loan transaction of Rs. 8,75,000 provided to the defendant during an engagement celebration in April 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case