LINGAM V vs VIJAYA GOWRI L — 269/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNRM080047112024

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

08-08-2024

Filing Number

4696/2024

Filing Date

08-08-2024

Registration No

269/2024

Registration Date

23-08-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mudukulathur

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

LINGAM V

Adv. Thiru.K.Mangalanathan

Respondent(s)

VIJAYA GOWRI L

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate

16-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

30-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

26-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

04-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

29-11-2024
Copy of Deposition

Court Order Summary Case No.: STC.No.269/2024 Date: 29.11.2024 The witness re-appeared in court and underwent cross-examination by the opposing counsel on 29 November 2024. The cross-examination proceedings were recorded in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness provided detailed testimony regarding his professional background as a lawyer, financial details including bank accounts and income tax returns, property ownership, and circumstances surrounding an alleged loan transaction of Rs. 8,75,000 provided to the defendant during an engagement celebration in April 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case No.: STC.No.269/2024 Date: 29.11.2024 The witness re-appeared in court and underwent cross-examination by the opposing counsel on 29 November 2024. The cross-examination proceedings were recorded in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness provided detailed testimony regarding his professional background as a lawyer, financial details including bank accounts and income tax returns, property ownership, and circumstances surrounding an alleged loan transaction of Rs. 8,75,000 provided to the defendant during an engagement celebration in April 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mudukulathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case