Elanjembur Police Station vs ARIRAM — 84/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM080004762025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-03-2025

Filing Number

465/2025

Filing Date

27-03-2025

Registration No

84/2025

Registration Date

30-05-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mudukulathur

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

ELANGEMPUR P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

Elanjembur Police Station

Adv. SI OF POLICE ELANJEMBUR PS

Respondent(s)

ARIRAM

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate

26-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Questioning

05-03-2026

Questioning

26-02-2026

Questioning

19-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation by threat), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the government witnesses' testimonies unreliable and the complaint lacks credibility. Key Reasoning: The court observed that witnesses (prosecution witnesses 1-3) either did not directly observe the incident or contradicted the narrative. No corroborating physical evidence was presented. The accused was released under section 271(1) B.N.S.S Act with bail bond cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation by threat), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the government witnesses' testimonies unreliable and the complaint lacks credibility. Key Reasoning: The court observed that witnesses (prosecution witnesses 1-3) either did not directly observe the incident or contradicted the narrative. No corroborating physical evidence was presented. The accused was released under section 271(1) B.N.S.S Act with bail bond cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mudukulathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case