Elanjembur Police Station vs ARIRAM — 84/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM080004762025
e-Filing Number
26-03-2025
Filing Number
465/2025
Filing Date
27-03-2025
Registration No
84/2025
Registration Date
30-05-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mudukulathur
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
ELANGEMPUR P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Elanjembur Police Station
Adv. SI OF POLICE ELANJEMBUR PS
Respondent(s)
ARIRAM
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 05-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 26-02-2026 | Questioning |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation by threat), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the government witnesses' testimonies unreliable and the complaint lacks credibility. Key Reasoning: The court observed that witnesses (prosecution witnesses 1-3) either did not directly observe the incident or contradicted the narrative. No corroborating physical evidence was presented. The accused was released under section 271(1) B.N.S.S Act with bail bond cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation by threat), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the government witnesses' testimonies unreliable and the complaint lacks credibility. Key Reasoning: The court observed that witnesses (prosecution witnesses 1-3) either did not directly observe the incident or contradicted the narrative. No corroborating physical evidence was presented. The accused was released under section 271(1) B.N.S.S Act with bail bond cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts