SIP kamuthi PS vs Ponnirul and 1 other — 198/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(2),427. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM070058882022

Filing Number

5865/2022

Filing Date

20-Jul-2022

Registration No

198/2022

Registration Date

28-Jul-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

618

Police Station

KAMUDHI P.S

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(2),427

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police) kamuthi PS (Police Station)

    Adv. P.M.Muniandi, APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ponnirul and 1 other

  2. 2.Mariyammal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 198/2022 Court Decision: The District Munsiff Court in Kamuthi acquitted both defendants (Ponnirul and Mariyammal) of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 506(2), and 427. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt and ordered their release under CrPC section 248(1). Key Reasoning: The court identified critical inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, including a 17-day delay in filing the FIR (complaint dated 23.07.2021 but report filed 09.08.2021), unexplained contradictions regarding how the defendant's motorcycle was allegedly damaged, and lack of credible corroborating evidence from other witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 26-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 25-May-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  6. 25-May-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  7. 25-May-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 13-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 06-May-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  10. 06-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 20-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 12-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 17-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 25-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 14-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 05-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 21-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 10-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 13-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 23-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 15-May-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 16-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 18-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 25-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 13-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 07-Sep-2022

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  30. 29-Aug-2022

    Copies

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  31. 28-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 20-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 198/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 198/2022 Court Decision: The District Munsiff Court in Kamuthi acquitted both defendants (Ponnirul and Mariyammal) of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 506(2), and 427. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt and ordered their release under CrPC section 248(1). Key Reasoning: The court identified critical inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, including a 17-day delay in filing the FIR (complaint dated 23.07.2021 but report filed 09.08.2021), unexplained contradictions regarding how the defendant's motorcycle was allegedly damaged, and lack of credible corroborating evidence from other witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case