Sub Inspector Of Police Kamuthi Ps vs Murugan Advocate - Tr.K.Rameshkannan — 312/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 338,279,337. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNRM070051422024

e-Filing Number

27-06-2024

Filing Number

5076/2024

Filing Date

27-Jun-2024

Registration No

312/2024

Registration Date

28-Jun-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 338,279,337

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector Of Police Kamuthi Ps (Police Station)

    Adv. P.M.Muniandi, APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Murugan Advocate - Tr.K.Rameshkannan

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    This is a deposition of prosecution witness PW-3 (a 16-year-old named Abish) in Case No. STC 312/2024 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthy, dated 09.02.2026. The witness testified regarding a vehicular accident on 03.01.2024 where he fell from a vehicle being driven recklessly by the accused, sustaining serious injuries including abrasions on his left arm, leg, and face, while his father also suffered injuries. The court found the witness to have requisite mental maturity to testify, and no cross-examination was conducted by the defense (defense cross-examination: nil). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 26-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 09-Jun-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  17. 09-Jun-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  18. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 12-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 04-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 07-Feb-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 10-Jan-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 15-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 28-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 09-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 29-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 26-Jul-2024

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 28-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 27-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 312/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This is a deposition of prosecution witness PW-3 (a 16-year-old named Abish) in Case No. STC 312/2024 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthy, dated 09.02.2026. The witness testified regarding a vehicular accident on 03.01.2024 where he fell from a vehicle being driven recklessly by the accused, sustaining serious injuries including abrasions on his left arm, leg, and face, while his father also suffered injuries. The court found the witness to have requisite mental maturity to testify, and no cross-examination was conducted by the defense (defense cross-examination: nil). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case