Sub Inspector Of Police Kamuthi Ps vs Murugan Advocate - Tr.K.Rameshkannan — 312/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 338,279,337. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNRM070051422024
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
27-06-2024
Filing Number
5076/2024
Filing Date
27-06-2024
Registration No
312/2024
Registration Date
28-06-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector Of Police Kamuthi Ps (Police Station)
Adv. P.M.Muniandi, APP
Respondent(s)
Murugan Advocate - Tr.K.Rameshkannan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a deposition of prosecution witness PW-3 (a 16-year-old named Abish) in Case No. STC 312/2024 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthy, dated 09.02.2026. The witness testified regarding a vehicular accident on 03.01.2024 where he fell from a vehicle being driven recklessly by the accused, sustaining serious injuries including abrasions on his left arm, leg, and face, while his father also suffered injuries. The court found the witness to have requisite mental maturity to testify, and no cross-examination was conducted by the defense (defense cross-examination: nil). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a deposition of prosecution witness PW-3 (a 16-year-old named Abish) in Case No. STC 312/2024 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthy, dated 09.02.2026. The witness testified regarding a vehicular accident on 03.01.2024 where he fell from a vehicle being driven recklessly by the accused, sustaining serious injuries including abrasions on his left arm, leg, and face, while his father also suffered injuries. The court found the witness to have requisite mental maturity to testify, and no cross-examination was conducted by the defense (defense cross-examination: nil). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts