SI of Police, Kamuthi PS vs Muthupandi and 1 other — 179/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM070006532026

Filing Number

608/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

179/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

KAMUDHI P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

1.SI of Police, Kamuthi PS (Police Station)

Adv. P.M.Muniandi, APP

Respondent(s)

1.Muthupandi and 1 other

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
04-Jun-2026

Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

The District Court in Kamuthy granted bail to two accused (Muthuppandi and Mahaanaperumal) charged under BNS sections 118(1), 126(2), 296(B), and 351(3), finding that they had already spent 11 days in judicial custody and the victim's injuries were minor. The court imposed stringent conditions including ₹10,000 bail bonds each, daily reporting at the police station for 20 days, non-interference with witnesses, and court appearance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
04-Jun-2026

Disposed

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
03-Jun-2026

Enquiry

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
02-Jun-2026

Issue of Service

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
01-Jun-2026

Issue of Service

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
29-May-2026

Issue of Service

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
26-May-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
26-May-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 179/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court in Kamuthy granted bail to two accused (Muthuppandi and Mahaanaperumal) charged under BNS sections 118(1), 126(2), 296(B), and 351(3), finding that they had already spent 11 days in judicial custody and the victim's injuries were minor. The court imposed stringent conditions including ₹10,000 bail bonds each, daily reporting at the police station for 20 days, non-interference with witnesses, and court appearance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.