Sundar vs Sub Inspector of Police, Kamuthi Police station — 176/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 26th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM070006482026
Filing Number
604/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
176/2026
Registration Date
25-May-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
352
Police Station
KAMUDHI P.S
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sundar
Adv. S.RAMANATHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sub Inspector of Police, Kamuthi Police station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 176/2026 The District Court in Kamuthi granted bail to petitioner Sundar, who was arrested on May 23, 2026, under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, and 506(2) for allegedly assaulting another person with a brick, causing injuries, and making threats. The court found that while serious charges exist, Sundar's detention in judicial custody was no longer necessary, particularly as he claimed to be seeking employment outside the district. Bail was granted subject to conditions including two sureties of ₹10,000 each, weekly court appearances, and undertaking not to commit similar offenses or tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 176/2026
Case Summary: 176/2026 The District Court in Kamuthi granted bail to petitioner Sundar, who was arrested on May 23, 2026, under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, and 506(2) for allegedly assaulting another person with a brick, causing injuries, and making threats. The court found that while serious charges exist, Sundar's detention in judicial custody was no longer necessary, particularly as he claimed to be seeking employment outside the district. Bail was granted subject to conditions including two sureties of ₹10,000 each, weekly court appearances, and undertaking not to commit similar offenses or tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts