Jothi muthu and 2 others vs Govindhan and 9 others — 18/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2),25(d). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM070003212021
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
38/2021
Filing Date
30-07-2021
Registration No
18/2021
Registration Date
30-07-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jothi muthu and 2 others
Adv. Tr.K.Rameshkannan
Palanimurugan
Adv. Tr.K.Rameshkannan
Ponmala
Adv. Tr.K.Rameshkannan
Palanimurugan
Adv. Tr.K.Rameshkannan
Ponmala
Adv. Tr.K.Rameshkannan
Respondent(s)
Govindhan and 9 others
Venkatachalam
Muralithar Vinmai border Private Limit through its power agent T.Rajarajan
Nagamani
Kallalagar
Azhagumalai
Velchamy
Shanmugavelu
Kottaichamy
Muneeswaran
Vengatasalam
Rajarajan
Nagamani
Adv. Tr.T.Ranjithkumar
Kallalagar
Alagumalai
Velsamy
Shanmugavelu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In OS No. 18/2021 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kamutti, the court recorded the affidavit testimony of the second witness (PW2) Sri Kalyani on August 18, 2025, under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness affirmed that the contents of the affidavit were true to his knowledge and requested it be accepted as his examination-in-chief; supporting documents including Aadhaar identity verification were marked as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In OS No. 18/2021 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kamutti, the court recorded the affidavit testimony of the second witness (PW2) Sri Kalyani on August 18, 2025, under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness affirmed that the contents of the affidavit were true to his knowledge and requested it be accepted as his examination-in-chief; supporting documents including Aadhaar identity verification were marked as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts