Sub Inspector of police, Abiramam PS vs Thirisangu — 95/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497and503. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM070002552026
Filing Number
236/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
95/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
285
Police Station
ABIRAMAM P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sub Inspector of police, Abiramam PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Thirisangu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The District Civil and Criminal Court at Kamudi dismissed the petitioner's application filed under BNSS sections 503 & 497, which sought custody of a seized JCB vehicle (TN 28 AP 9675) in a theft case (FIR 285/2021). The court rejected the plea because the petitioner failed to comply with conditions imposed by the High Court, which required deposit of ₹2,50,000 and a bond of ₹25,000 within two weeks, citing non-compliance as grounds for dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 95/2026
The District Civil and Criminal Court at Kamudi dismissed the petitioner's application filed under BNSS sections 503 & 497, which sought custody of a seized JCB vehicle (TN 28 AP 9675) in a theft case (FIR 285/2021). The court rejected the plea because the petitioner failed to comply with conditions imposed by the High Court, which required deposit of ₹2,50,000 and a bond of ₹25,000 within two weeks, citing non-compliance as grounds for dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts