SIP Kamuthi PS vs Muniyasamy — 88/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,354. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM070002182021
Filing Number
204/2021
Filing Date
16-Mar-2021
Registration No
88/2021
Registration Date
16-Mar-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
115
Police Station
KAMUDHI P.S
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police) Kamuthi PS (Police Station)
Adv. P.M.Muniandi, APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muniyasamy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
26-May-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 116/2021 Court Decision: The District Magistrate acquitted the accused (Muniyasamy) of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt), and 304(A) (causing death by negligence), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was released under CrPC Section 255(1). Key Reasoning: The court found critical inconsistencies in prosecution evidence—the complainant's testimony lacked credibility regarding the accident details, the witness statement was deemed unreliable, and police investigation procedures were questioned. The court concluded the prosecution had not established a case meeting the required standard of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-May-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-May-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-May-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-May-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-May-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jan-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2022
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2022
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jul-2022
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jun-2022
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2022
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2022
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jan-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2021
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2021
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2021
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2021
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jul-2021
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2021
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 88/2021
Case Summary: CC No. 116/2021 Court Decision: The District Magistrate acquitted the accused (Muniyasamy) of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt), and 304(A) (causing death by negligence), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was released under CrPC Section 255(1). Key Reasoning: The court found critical inconsistencies in prosecution evidence—the complainant's testimony lacked credibility regarding the accident details, the witness statement was deemed unreliable, and police investigation procedures were questioned. The court concluded the prosecution had not established a case meeting the required standard of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts