A.G.Murugan vs S.Arumugam — 55/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM070001192026
Filing Number
113/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.G.Murugan
Adv. Mr.P.Villikaruppanan
Respondent(s)
S.Arumugam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 16-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 07-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 30-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Munsif Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of witnesses for cross-examination, finding that the accused had been afforded sufficient opportunity to cross-examine the five witnesses examined on 14.12.2023, and deliberately evaded this opportunity despite nearly two years being granted. The court rejected the accused's claims of lack of document access and alleged High Court stay orders, noting that their counsel was present during witness examination and the accused failed to provide proof of any stay order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Munsif Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of witnesses for cross-examination, finding that the accused had been afforded sufficient opportunity to cross-examine the five witnesses examined on 14.12.2023, and deliberately evaded this opportunity despite nearly two years being granted. The court rejected the accused's claims of lack of document access and alleged High Court stay orders, noting that their counsel was present during witness examination and the accused failed to provide proof of any stay order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts