A.G.Murugan vs S.Arumugam — 55/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM070001192026

Filing Number

113/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.G.Murugan

    Adv. Mr.P.Villikaruppanan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.Arumugam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The District Munsif Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of witnesses for cross-examination, finding that the accused had been afforded sufficient opportunity to cross-examine the five witnesses examined on 14.12.2023, and deliberately evaded this opportunity despite nearly two years being granted. The court rejected the accused's claims of lack of document access and alleged High Court stay orders, noting that their counsel was present during witness examination and the accused failed to provide proof of any stay order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of witnesses for cross-examination, finding that the accused had been afforded sufficient opportunity to cross-examine the five witnesses examined on 14.12.2023, and deliberately evaded this opportunity despite nearly two years being granted. The court rejected the accused's claims of lack of document access and alleged High Court stay orders, noting that their counsel was present during witness examination and the accused failed to provide proof of any stay order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case