A.G.Murugan vs S.Arumugam — 55/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th May 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM070001192026

Case disposed

Filing Number

113/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348

Petitioner(s)

A.G.Murugan

Adv. Mr.P.Villikaruppanan

Respondent(s)

S.Arumugam

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

05-05-2026

Disposed

20-04-2026

For further Proceedings

16-04-2026

For further Proceedings

07-04-2026

For further Proceedings

30-03-2026

For further Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The District Munsif Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of witnesses for cross-examination, finding that the accused had been afforded sufficient opportunity to cross-examine the five witnesses examined on 14.12.2023, and deliberately evaded this opportunity despite nearly two years being granted. The court rejected the accused's claims of lack of document access and alleged High Court stay orders, noting that their counsel was present during witness examination and the accused failed to provide proof of any stay order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of witnesses for cross-examination, finding that the accused had been afforded sufficient opportunity to cross-examine the five witnesses examined on 14.12.2023, and deliberately evaded this opportunity despite nearly two years being granted. The court rejected the accused's claims of lack of document access and alleged High Court stay orders, noting that their counsel was present during witness examination and the accused failed to provide proof of any stay order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case