SIP Mandalamanickam PS vs Veeramaruthu — 43/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323(3counts). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM070001172021

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th April 2026

Filing Number

105/2021

Filing Date

03-03-2021

Registration No

43/2021

Registration Date

03-03-2021

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323(3counts)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police) Mandalamanickam PS (Police Station)

Adv. P.M.Muniandi, APP

Respondent(s)

Veeramaruthu

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

06-03-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

23-01-2026

Evidence

19-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

21-11-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

SUMMARY: This document is a witness deposition (not a court order), recording the testimony of Prosecution Witness PW.5 in Case CC 43/2021 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, dated 21.11.2025. The witness testified regarding a complaint filed by her brother about a dispute with the accused Veeramaruthu four years prior, and confirmed she signed as a witness when police investigated near the complainant's residence. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's credibility by questioning inconsistencies in her account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: This document is a witness deposition (not a court order), recording the testimony of Prosecution Witness PW.5 in Case CC 43/2021 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, dated 21.11.2025. The witness testified regarding a complaint filed by her brother about a dispute with the accused Veeramaruthu four years prior, and confirmed she signed as a witness when police investigated near the complainant's residence. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's credibility by questioning inconsistencies in her account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kamudhi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case