Sub Inspector of Police,Railway Ps Rameswaram vs Sakthikumar — 273/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM050045712023

Filing Number

4539/2023

Filing Date

25-Jul-2023

Registration No

273/2023

Registration Date

08-Aug-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

RAILWAY P.S

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police,Railway Ps (Police Station) Rameswaram

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sakthikumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Judgement on Admission AftView PDF

    Case 273/2023 Summary The District Munsiff Court in Rameswaram convicted Sakthikumar under Section 379 IPC (theft) for stealing a VIVO V17 mobile phone valued at ₹10,000 from a tea vendor on a running train on 05.04.2022. The accused pleaded guilty and admitted to the charges voluntarily, leading the court to impose a lenient sentence of 4 months simple imprisonment, a fine of ₹2,500 (with 1 week additional imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), and credited 129 days of pre-trial detention already served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 06-Jun-2026

    Await Records

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-May-2026

    Await Records

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 16-May-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 12-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 16-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 23-Oct-2024

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 03-Aug-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 16-May-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 14-Mar-2024

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 11-Jan-2024

    Service Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 07-Dec-2023

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 12-Oct-2023

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  30. 13-Sep-2023

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  31. 08-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 25-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 273/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 273/2023 Summary The District Munsiff Court in Rameswaram convicted Sakthikumar under Section 379 IPC (theft) for stealing a VIVO V17 mobile phone valued at ₹10,000 from a tea vendor on a running train on 05.04.2022. The accused pleaded guilty and admitted to the charges voluntarily, leading the court to impose a lenient sentence of 4 months simple imprisonment, a fine of ₹2,500 (with 1 week additional imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), and credited 129 days of pre-trial detention already served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case