Sub Inspector of police, Town ps vs Suresh Advocate - K.Mayilsamy — 128/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 22nd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM050042012022
Filing Number
4166/2022
Filing Date
13-Jul-2022
Registration No
128/2022
Registration Date
05-Sep-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
22-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
369
Police Station
RAMESWARAM TOWN P.S
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sub Inspector of police, Town ps (Police Station)
Adv. Tmt.T. VIJAYALAKSHMI APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suresh Advocate - K.Mayilsamy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Jun-2026
Judgement contested AftView PDF
Case Summary: 128/2022 Court Decision: The District Magistrate Court, Rameswaram acquitted the accused Suresh of all charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to material inconsistencies in witness testimony, particularly regarding the incident location and the credibility of key witnesses. Key Reasoning: Although the investigating officer testified about the case proceedings, the court noted contradictions between the eyewitness (PW1 Rani) and site investigation officer (PW4 Sasi Kumar) regarding where the incident occurred—whether at the accused's house or near the Iswari Amman temple, approximately 1 km away. The court also found two other witnesses admitted to giving false testimony and signing documents under police pressure, further undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jun-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jun-2026
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-May-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
22-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-May-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
12-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2024
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-May-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Nov-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jul-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jun-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-May-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-May-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Apr-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Mar-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Mar-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Feb-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Dec-2022
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2022
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Nov-2022
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Oct-2022
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 128/2022
Case Summary: 128/2022 Court Decision: The District Magistrate Court, Rameswaram acquitted the accused Suresh of all charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to material inconsistencies in witness testimony, particularly regarding the incident location and the credibility of key witnesses. Key Reasoning: Although the investigating officer testified about the case proceedings, the court noted contradictions between the eyewitness (PW1 Rani) and site investigation officer (PW4 Sasi Kumar) regarding where the incident occurred—whether at the accused's house or near the Iswari Amman temple, approximately 1 km away. The court also found two other witnesses admitted to giving false testimony and signing documents under police pressure, further undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts