Sub Inspector of police, Jetty ps vs Meldash and 1 another Advocate - Mr.R.Vijaya Kumar — 75/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(1),323. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM050009952023
Filing Number
988/2023
Filing Date
01-Mar-2023
Registration No
75/2023
Registration Date
01-Mar-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
82
Police Station
Jetty P.S.
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sub Inspector of police, Jetty ps (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Meldash and 1 another Advocate - Mr.R.Vijaya Kumar
-
2.Pinu
Adv. Mr.R.Vijaya Kumar
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Mar-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2024
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Dec-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Sep-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2023
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Aug-2023
Copy of depositionView PDF
This document is a deposition of prosecution witness (PW3) in Case No. CC.No.75/2023 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram, dated 01.08.2023. The witness provided testimony regarding an alleged incident on 01.08.2019 at 2:00 PM involving accused A.S.1, with A1 absent and A2 present in court. The document records the witness's statement detailing the alleged facts of the case, but does not contain a final court order granting or denying relief—it is merely a record of witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Aug-2023
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2023
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
18-Jul-2023
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
18-Jul-2023
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jun-2023
Service Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2023
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2023
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 75/2023
This document is a deposition of prosecution witness (PW3) in Case No. CC.No.75/2023 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram, dated 01.08.2023. The witness provided testimony regarding an alleged incident on 01.08.2019 at 2:00 PM involving accused A.S.1, with A1 absent and A2 present in court. The document records the witness's statement detailing the alleged facts of the case, but does not contain a final court order granting or denying relief—it is merely a record of witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts