Murugesan vs Sagaya kabilas Advocate - Mr.J.Udhuman — 60/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM050008802023

Filing Number

876/2023

Filing Date

21-Feb-2023

Registration No

60/2023

Registration Date

21-Feb-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugesan

    Adv. Seenimuthu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sagaya kabilas Advocate - Mr.J.Udhuman

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 08-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 14-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 26-May-2025

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 05-May-2025

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 08-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 14-Dec-2024

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 04-Dec-2024

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 18-Sep-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition transcript (cross-examination) from a civil case (CC.No.60/2023) in the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram, recorded on 18.09.2024. The witness (PW-1) provides testimony regarding disputed cheque transactions and a loan dispute with the accused, with detailed questioning on banking procedures, payment locations, and the authenticity of signatures and documents. No case outcome (bail, petition decision, or adjournment order) is stated in this document — it is purely a deposition record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 18-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  30. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  31. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  32. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  33. 24-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  34. 08-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  35. 29-May-2024

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  36. 24-May-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  37. 24-May-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  38. 16-May-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  39. 25-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  40. 04-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  41. 09-Mar-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  42. 19-Feb-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  43. 24-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  44. 20-Dec-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  45. 22-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  46. 01-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  47. 16-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  48. 27-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  49. 02-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  50. 05-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  51. 12-Jul-2023

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  52. 14-Jun-2023

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  53. 02-May-2023

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  54. 29-Mar-2023

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  55. 21-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2023

  56. 20-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition transcript (cross-examination) from a civil case (CC.No.60/2023) in the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram, recorded on 18.09.2024. The witness (PW-1) provides testimony regarding disputed cheque transactions and a loan dispute with the accused, with detailed questioning on banking procedures, payment locations, and the authenticity of signatures and documents. No case outcome (bail, petition decision, or adjournment order) is stated in this document — it is purely a deposition record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case