Thirumalaikanan vs Inspector of Police Advocate - T.Marimuthu — 127/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM050003592026
Filing Number
347/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
127/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
108
Police Station
PAMBAN P.S
Year
2022
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thirumalaikanan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Advocate - T.Marimuthu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram allowed the accused's petition under Section 348 BNSS to recall two prime witnesses (PW1, PW2) for cross-examination, as they had been examined-in-chief on 18.07.2023 but never cross-examined, which would deny the accused fair defense. The court imposed a condition requiring the accused to pay Rs.1,000 each (total Rs.2,000) to the witnesses on the day of cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2026
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram allowed the accused's petition under Section 348 BNSS to recall two prime witnesses (PW1, PW2) for cross-examination, as they had been examined-in-chief on 18.07.2023 but never cross-examined, which would deny the accused fair defense. The court imposed a condition requiring the accused to pay Rs.1,000 each (total Rs.2,000) to the witnesses on the day of cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts