Pavithran vs Mandapam Police Station — 124/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497(2),503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM050003332026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

322/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

124/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

MANDAPAM P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497(2),503

Petitioner(s)

Pavithran

Adv. GOPINATH S

Respondent(s)

Mandapam Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

12-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Enquiry

05-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Property Order

Summary The District Munsif Court granted interim custody of a seized Yamaha MT motorcycle (TN 65 AT 9875) to petitioner Pavithran, relying on the Supreme Court's *Sundarabai Ambalal Desai* precedent that seizure photographs are sufficient proof. The court imposed strict conditions: the petitioner must execute a bond of Rs. 60,000 with two sureties of Rs. 30,000 each, submit affidavits confirming non-alteration and non-commission of motor vehicle offences, and produce the vehicle at trial, despite police objections based on the accused's prior dangerous driving and stunt-posting behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Munsif Court granted interim custody of a seized Yamaha MT motorcycle (TN 65 AT 9875) to petitioner Pavithran, relying on the Supreme Court's *Sundarabai Ambalal Desai* precedent that seizure photographs are sufficient proof. The court imposed strict conditions: the petitioner must execute a bond of Rs. 60,000 with two sureties of Rs. 30,000 each, submit affidavits confirming non-alteration and non-commission of motor vehicle offences, and produce the vehicle at trial, despite police objections based on the accused's prior dangerous driving and stunt-posting behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case