Pavithran vs Mandapam Police Station — 124/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497(2),503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM050003332026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
322/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
124/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
MANDAPAM P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pavithran
Adv. GOPINATH S
Respondent(s)
Mandapam Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Enquiry
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 05-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Munsif Court granted interim custody of a seized Yamaha MT motorcycle (TN 65 AT 9875) to petitioner Pavithran, relying on the Supreme Court's *Sundarabai Ambalal Desai* precedent that seizure photographs are sufficient proof. The court imposed strict conditions: the petitioner must execute a bond of Rs. 60,000 with two sureties of Rs. 30,000 each, submit affidavits confirming non-alteration and non-commission of motor vehicle offences, and produce the vehicle at trial, despite police objections based on the accused's prior dangerous driving and stunt-posting behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Munsif Court granted interim custody of a seized Yamaha MT motorcycle (TN 65 AT 9875) to petitioner Pavithran, relying on the Supreme Court's *Sundarabai Ambalal Desai* precedent that seizure photographs are sufficient proof. The court imposed strict conditions: the petitioner must execute a bond of Rs. 60,000 with two sureties of Rs. 30,000 each, submit affidavits confirming non-alteration and non-commission of motor vehicle offences, and produce the vehicle at trial, despite police objections based on the accused's prior dangerous driving and stunt-posting behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts