Vikram vs Bisleri — 28/2026

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM050000572026

Filing Number

53/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameswaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0

Police Station

RAMESWARAM TOWN P.S

Year

0

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bisleri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram allowed the petitioner's application under Section 348 BNSS to recall the complainant (PW1) for re-examination. The court found it mandatory to mark the material object (unsafe water can) as evidence to substantiate the FSSAI Act charges (Sections 51, 54, 56, 59), as this evidence was not marked during the initial examination on 27.11.2025. The accused raised no objection to the recall. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram allowed the petitioner's application under Section 348 BNSS to recall the complainant (PW1) for re-examination. The court found it mandatory to mark the material object (unsafe water can) as evidence to substantiate the FSSAI Act charges (Sections 51, 54, 56, 59), as this evidence was not marked during the initial examination on 27.11.2025. The accused raised no objection to the recall. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case