Inspector of Police, Kenikarai vs Hasan Khan — 294/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM020084542022
Filing Number
8411/2022
Filing Date
04-Aug-2022
Registration No
294/2025
Registration Date
12-Jun-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No II
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
165
Police Station
KENIKARAI P.S
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Kenikarai
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hasan Khan
-
2.Nehrudass (Wasim Khan)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ramanathapuram acquitted both accused persons under IPC sections 294(b) and 324, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the complainant and eyewitnesses' testimonies were unreliable and contradicted the investigating officer's documentary evidence, and the case evidence was insufficient to establish guilt with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
12-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
18-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
23-Oct-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
08-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
17-Jul-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
11-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
13-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 294/2025
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Ramanathapuram acquitted both accused persons under IPC sections 294(b) and 324, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the complainant and eyewitnesses' testimonies were unreliable and contradicted the investigating officer's documentary evidence, and the case evidence was insufficient to establish guilt with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts