Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram vs Saravanakumar — 1833/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 420,506(i). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 25th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM020023922023
Filing Number
2323/2023
Filing Date
24-03-2023
Registration No
1833/2023
Registration Date
24-03-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No II
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
2
Police Station
DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH DCB RAMANATHAPURAM
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram
Adv. APP Gr.I. Amarjothi
Respondent(s)
Saravanakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No II
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Orders |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 25-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
The court accepted the complainant's petition challenging the investigating officer's final report that excluded two accused persons (Manikandan and Deepan) from the fraud case. The court found credible evidence through bank statements and witness testimonies that both accused were involved in the conspiracy to defraud the complainant of ₹56.30 lakh through coordinated illegal fund transfers, and ordered the case be proceeded against all three accused under IPC sections 420, 506(i), and IT Act section 67. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court accepted the complainant's petition challenging the investigating officer's final report that excluded two accused persons (Manikandan and Deepan) from the fraud case. The court found credible evidence through bank statements and witness testimonies that both accused were involved in the conspiracy to defraud the complainant of ₹56.30 lakh through coordinated illegal fund transfers, and ordered the case be proceeded against all three accused under IPC sections 420, 506(i), and IT Act section 67. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts