Gopalakrishnamoorthy vs T.U.Mangai PS — 517/2026

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM020015112026

Filing Number

1410/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

517/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate No I

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

T.U MANGAI P.S

Year

2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gopalakrishnamoorthy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T.U.Mangai PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 517/2026 Summary: The Magistrate Court dismissed the petition filed by Gopalakrishnamoorthy seeking return of a two-wheeler (TN 65 BD 4647) seized under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. The court held that since the vehicle is undergoing forfeiture proceedings under Section 14 of the TNP Act before the appropriate authorities, it was improper to order its release or custody transfer at this stage. The petitioner was directed to pursue the forfeiture process through the competent authority instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Await Reports

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  5. 27-May-2026

    Await Reports

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  6. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 517/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 517/2026 Summary: The Magistrate Court dismissed the petition filed by Gopalakrishnamoorthy seeking return of a two-wheeler (TN 65 BD 4647) seized under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. The court held that since the vehicle is undergoing forfeiture proceedings under Section 14 of the TNP Act before the appropriate authorities, it was improper to order its release or custody transfer at this stage. The petitioner was directed to pursue the forfeiture process through the competent authority instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case