Mahendran vs Kenikarai PS — 455/2026

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM020013242026

Filing Number

1229/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

455/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No II

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

368

Police Station

KENIKARAI P.S

Year

2025

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahendran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kenikarai PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Mahendran v. Kenikarai PS (Crl. M.P. No. 455/2026) The court granted Mahendran's petition for temporary custody of 6.580 grams of broken gold jewelry seized in FIR No. 368/2025 under Section 304(2) BNS. The court found that the accused's confession established the petitioner's ownership of the property, and applying precedent that case property can be returned when ownership is traceable to the de facto complainant, approved temporary release subject to strict conditions including ₹1,00,000 bond and restrictions against transferring or disposing the item. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  4. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  5. 25-May-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  6. 20-May-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  7. 18-May-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  8. 08-May-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  9. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 455/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mahendran v. Kenikarai PS (Crl. M.P. No. 455/2026) The court granted Mahendran's petition for temporary custody of 6.580 grams of broken gold jewelry seized in FIR No. 368/2025 under Section 304(2) BNS. The court found that the accused's confession established the petitioner's ownership of the property, and applying precedent that case property can be returned when ownership is traceable to the de facto complainant, approved temporary release subject to strict conditions including ₹1,00,000 bond and restrictions against transferring or disposing the item. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case