Muniyasami vs Mohamed Ali Jinna Advocate - Thiru. K. Muthu Duraisamy — 22/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,166. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNRM020010782025

Filing Number

24/2025

Filing Date

29-Jan-2025

Registration No

22/2025

Registration Date

30-Jan-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,166
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Others Section MuniyasamiThe Branch Manager, Cholamandalam insurance co ltd, Madurai
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Petition to Set Aside Exparte

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muniyasami

    Adv. Thiru. Deva Manohara martin

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohamed Ali Jinna Advocate - Thiru. K. Muthu Duraisamy

  2. 2.The Branch Manager, Cholamandalam insurance co ltd, Madurai

    Adv. Ex-Parte

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: MCOP No. 22/2025 | Court: Criminal Court, Ramanathapuram | Date: 17.03.2026 In this motor accident compensation petition, the witness (first defendant's driver) testified that the accident occurred due to the petitioner's negligence and not the defendant's. The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the first defendant (vehicle owner) and second defendant (insurance company) are not liable to pay compensation to the petitioner for the injuries and permanent disability sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 16-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 13-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 15-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 17-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 17-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 14-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 29-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: MCOP No. 22/2025 | Court: Criminal Court, Ramanathapuram | Date: 17.03.2026 In this motor accident compensation petition, the witness (first defendant's driver) testified that the accident occurred due to the petitioner's negligence and not the defendant's. The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the first defendant (vehicle owner) and second defendant (insurance company) are not liable to pay compensation to the petitioner for the injuries and permanent disability sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case