Senthilkumar vs The inspector of police — 266/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM020007922026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

736/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

266/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No II

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

Cyber Crime Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Senthilkumar

    Adv. MUTHU KUMAR M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The inspector of police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court granted partial relief to the petitioner by relaxing his bail conditions. While the petitioner was required to appear at the police station on the 1st and 3rd Monday of each month at 10 AM under previous orders (Cr.M.P. No. 30/2026), the court modified this to allow appearance only once every 15 days on Mondays, citing the petitioner's health issues including epilepsy and physical disabilities that prevent independent movement. The court maintained the core condition that the petitioner must appear before the court when summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 266/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted partial relief to the petitioner by relaxing his bail conditions. While the petitioner was required to appear at the police station on the 1st and 3rd Monday of each month at 10 AM under previous orders (Cr.M.P. No. 30/2026), the court modified this to allow appearance only once every 15 days on Mondays, citing the petitioner's health issues including epilepsy and physical disabilities that prevent independent movement. The court maintained the core condition that the petitioner must appear before the court when summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case