Rahuman vs Ervadi PS — 257/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM020007542026

Filing Number

698/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

257/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No II

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahuman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ervadi PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Ramanathapuram dismissed the bail petition of Rahuman Khan, accused of non-bailable offences under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii). The court found that the accused absconded for one year after a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) was issued in March 2025, without providing satisfactory reasons, demonstrating a high risk of further absconding if released. Considering the gravity of charges, previous criminal antecedents, case stage, and likelihood of non-appearance, the court determined bail would be unjust and improper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 257/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Ramanathapuram dismissed the bail petition of Rahuman Khan, accused of non-bailable offences under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii). The court found that the accused absconded for one year after a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) was issued in March 2025, without providing satisfactory reasons, demonstrating a high risk of further absconding if released. Considering the gravity of charges, previous criminal antecedents, case stage, and likelihood of non-appearance, the court determined bail would be unjust and improper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case