Surrender vs Kenikkarai Advocate - Thiru. S. Srikanth — 252/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM020007472026

Filing Number

691/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No II

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Surrender

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kenikkarai Advocate - Thiru. S. Srikanth

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate II of Ramanathapuram allowed Surender's bail petition under Section 480 BNSS, despite the non-bailable nature of offences under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3) BNS. The court granted bail considering that substantial investigation was complete, no hospitalization occurred, the complainant filed a compromise affidavit, and the accused had a permanent residence with no prior criminal record. Bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting at 10 AM, and compliance with further interrogation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate II of Ramanathapuram allowed Surender's bail petition under Section 480 BNSS, despite the non-bailable nature of offences under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3) BNS. The court granted bail considering that substantial investigation was complete, no hospitalization occurred, the complainant filed a compromise affidavit, and the accused had a permanent residence with no prior criminal record. Bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting at 10 AM, and compliance with further interrogation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case