Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai P.S., vs Balachandran — 45/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,294(b),506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 21-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM020004812025

e-Filing Number

26-01-2025

Filing Number

465/2025

Filing Date

28-Jan-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

21-Feb-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No II

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

510

Police Station

KENIKARAI P.S

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,294(b),506(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai P.S.,

    Adv. Inspector of Police Kenikkarai PS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balachandran

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jul-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case 45/2025 Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final judgment) in a criminal case at Ramanathapuram Judicial Magistrate Court involving a land transaction dispute. The witness testified on July 8, 2026, regarding a 70-cent property sale agreement dated February 20, 2019, with respondent Balachandran, involving total payments of ₹91 lakhs. The witness alleged that Balachandran later threatened him with violence and PC Act charges when demanding return of an adjacent plot purchased for ₹35 lakhs, and that Balachandran subsequently sold the property to another party. The cross-examination by the defense was concluded as they declined to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jul-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  4. 30-Jun-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  5. 23-Jun-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  6. 16-Jun-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  7. 11-Jun-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  8. 02-Jun-2026

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  9. 26-May-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  10. 25-May-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  11. 19-May-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  12. 27-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  13. 13-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  14. 29-Jan-2026

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  15. 23-Jan-2026

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  16. 09-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  17. 18-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  18. 12-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  19. 26-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  20. 22-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  21. 25-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  22. 25-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  23. 11-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  24. 02-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  25. 27-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  26. 17-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  27. 03-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  28. 13-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  29. 08-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  30. 07-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  31. 26-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  32. 21-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 28-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 45/2025 Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final judgment) in a criminal case at Ramanathapuram Judicial Magistrate Court involving a land transaction dispute. The witness testified on July 8, 2026, regarding a 70-cent property sale agreement dated February 20, 2019, with respondent Balachandran, involving total payments of ₹91 lakhs. The witness alleged that Balachandran later threatened him with violence and PC Act charges when demanding return of an adjacent plot purchased for ₹35 lakhs, and that Balachandran subsequently sold the property to another party. The cross-examination by the defense was concluded as they declined to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case