SIP Devipattinam vs Naveen Kumar — 155/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM020003712026

Filing Number

338/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

155/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate No I

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police) Devipattinam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Naveen Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Ramanathapuram ordered the release of a seized three-wheeler vehicle (TN 65 AS 4045) to the petitioner/vehicle owner on interim custody basis, finding the petitioner to be the legitimate registered owner based on the RC book. The court imposed conditions including a bond of ₹2,50,000, two sureties of ₹10,000 each, and required the original RC book to be obtained from the finance company with undertakings that the vehicle would not be transferred or misused during the pending criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 155/2026

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Ramanathapuram ordered the release of a seized three-wheeler vehicle (TN 65 AS 4045) to the petitioner/vehicle owner on interim custody basis, finding the petitioner to be the legitimate registered owner based on the RC book. The court imposed conditions including a bond of ₹2,50,000, two sureties of ₹10,000 each, and required the original RC book to be obtained from the finance company with undertakings that the vehicle would not be transferred or misused during the pending criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case