Muneeswaran vs Saravanakumar Advocate - Ex-Parte — 9/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140141142163(B)166AND182(A). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 02-Jun-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNRM020001772024

e-Filing Number

09-01-2024

Filing Number

10/2024

Filing Date

09-Jan-2024

Registration No

9/2024

Registration Date

12-Jan-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140141142163(B)166AND182(A)
Ia/1/2024 Classification : Petition to Exempt Court Fee Section Muneeswaran
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Others Section Muneeswaran

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muneeswaran

    Adv. Thiru. Ramakrishnan. V.T.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saravanakumar Advocate - Ex-Parte

  2. 2.Branch Manager

    Adv. Thiru. P. Venkatesan

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 30-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: MCOP. No. 9/2024, Criminal Court, Ramanathapuram Outcome: Witness examination completed on 30.10.2025. The petitioner's witness (Ragukularakesh) provided sworn testimony in open court, which was recorded and read back to the witness for confirmation. No cross-examination was conducted by the opposing party. The testimony was certified as accurate by the witness and the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 25-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 14-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 17-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 24-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 03-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 02-Apr-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 06-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 04-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 08-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 04-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 16-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 11-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 14-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 03-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 12-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 24-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 03-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 02-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 28-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 21-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 12-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 09-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: MCOP. No. 9/2024, Criminal Court, Ramanathapuram Outcome: Witness examination completed on 30.10.2025. The petitioner's witness (Ragukularakesh) provided sworn testimony in open court, which was recorded and read back to the witness for confirmation. No cross-examination was conducted by the opposing party. The testimony was certified as accurate by the witness and the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case