CCIW-CID, Ramnad vs Krishnan Advocate - K. Anbuchezhiyan — 600138/2008

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 408. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 21-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM020000382008

Filing Number

600602/2008

Filing Date

08-May-2008

Registration No

600138/2008

Registration Date

08-May-2008

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate No I

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

CCIW P.S RAMANATHAPURAM

Year

2006

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 408

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CCIW-CID, Ramnad

    Adv. Ramasamy Gr.I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Krishnan Advocate - K. Anbuchezhiyan

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  3. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  6. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  8. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  9. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  10. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  11. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  12. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  13. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  14. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  15. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  16. 05-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  17. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  18. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  19. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  20. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  21. 05-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  22. 30-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  23. 26-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  24. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  25. 05-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  26. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  27. 04-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  28. 01-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  29. 25-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  30. 14-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  31. 31-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  32. 03-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  33. 13-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  34. 08-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  35. 27-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  36. 16-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  37. 21-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  38. 31-May-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  39. 05-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  40. 01-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  41. 11-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  42. 23-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  43. 07-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  44. 10-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  45. 08-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  46. 30-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  47. 09-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  48. 15-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  49. 13-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  50. 18-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  51. 09-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  52. 08-May-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  53. 21-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  54. 10-Mar-2020

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 600138/2008 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner (CCIW-CID, Ramnad) failed to establish grounds for the relief sought against respondent K. Anbuchezhiyan (Advocate). The court determined the respondent's conduct did not warrant the intervention requested and rejected the petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  55. 10-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  56. 18-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  57. 28-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  58. 10-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  59. 19-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  60. 05-Nov-2019

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  61. 05-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  62. 16-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  63. 24-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  64. 27-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  65. 19-Aug-2019

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  66. 06-Aug-2019

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  67. 11-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  68. 30-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  69. 26-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  70. 05-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  71. 11-Dec-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  72. 16-Oct-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  73. 28-Aug-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  74. 04-Aug-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  75. 17-Jul-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  76. 05-Jun-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  77. 08-May-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  78. 20-Mar-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  79. 20-Feb-2018

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  80. 23-Jan-2018

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  81. 19-Dec-2017

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  82. 31-Oct-2017

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  83. 19-Sep-2017

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  84. 25-Jul-2017

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  85. 13-Jun-2017

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  86. 09-May-2017

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  87. 11-Apr-2017

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  88. 28-Feb-2017

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  89. 31-Jan-2017

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  90. 10-Jan-2017

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  91. 20-Dec-2016

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  92. 22-Nov-2016

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  93. 06-Sep-2016

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  94. 02-Aug-2016

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  95. 31-May-2016

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  96. 22-Mar-2016

    Evidence

  97. 05-Jan-2016

    Evidence

  98. 20-Oct-2015

    Evidence

  99. 04-Aug-2015

    Evidence

  100. 02-Jun-2015

    Evidence

  101. 10-Mar-2015

    Evidence

  102. 09-May-2008

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  103. 08-May-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. 600138/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 600138/2008 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner (CCIW-CID, Ramnad) failed to establish grounds for the relief sought against respondent K. Anbuchezhiyan (Advocate). The court determined the respondent's conduct did not warrant the intervention requested and rejected the petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case