Balasubramanian vs The Special District Revenue Officer — 25/2024

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNRM010066932023

e-Filing Number

25-11-2023

Filing Number

839/2023

Filing Date

04-Dec-2023

Registration No

25/2024

Registration Date

19-Mar-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balasubramanian

    Adv. Thirunavukkarasu Thirunavukkarasu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Special District Revenue Officer

  2. 2.The Project Director

  3. 3.The District Collector

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  10. 31-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  11. 09-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  12. 17-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  13. 20-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  14. 02-Aug-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  15. 02-Aug-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    The Principal District Court of Ramanathapuram (AR.O.P. No. 25/2024, dated 02.08.2025) examined the petitioner's cross-examination regarding land valuation and compensation disputes. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments about inadequate compensation, ruling that market-based pricing of Rs. 2,00,000 per cent was properly applied and the awarded compensation was justified based on survey documents and applicable valuation standards. Further hearing was rejected (dismissed). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 02-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  17. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 04-Jul-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  20. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  24. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 06-Feb-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  26. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  27. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  28. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  29. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  30. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  31. 06-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  32. 24-Oct-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  33. 24-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  34. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  35. 30-Sep-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  36. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  37. 27-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  38. 03-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  39. 30-Aug-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Judge

  40. 23-Aug-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Judge

  41. 12-Aug-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Judge

  42. 05-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  43. 22-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  44. 06-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  45. 28-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  46. 04-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  47. 18-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  48. 19-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 04-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Court of Ramanathapuram (AR.O.P. No. 25/2024, dated 02.08.2025) examined the petitioner's cross-examination regarding land valuation and compensation disputes. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments about inadequate compensation, ruling that market-based pricing of Rs. 2,00,000 per cent was properly applied and the awarded compensation was justified based on survey documents and applicable valuation standards. Further hearing was rejected (dismissed). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case