Muniyasamy vs Ramesh — 36/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,160. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNRM010060972024
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
22-11-2024
Filing Number
763/2024
Filing Date
22-11-2024
Registration No
36/2025
Registration Date
23-01-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muniyasamy
Adv. SEKAR M
Muthumari
Adv. SEKAR M
Karthik
Adv. SEKAR M
Respondent(s)
Ramesh
Branch Manager, Sriram general insurance co ltd, Kamuthi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
For further Proceedings
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 12-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 25-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a Motor Claims Ombudsman Petition (MCOP No. 36/2025) from the Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram, dated February 25, 2026, concerning a two-wheeler accident that occurred on January 29, 2023. The claimant (witness Muthukumari) testified that her son Arun died in the accident caused by a vehicle collision, and she filed a compensation claim. The court examined documentary evidence including the FIR, post-mortem report, death certificate, vehicle inspection report, and employment certificate. The court admitted the second defendant's cross-examination arguments and dismissed the petition, ruling that the case is not maintainable due to a prior compensation claim (MCOP No. 2786/2023) filed in Chennai City Small Causes Court for the same incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a Motor Claims Ombudsman Petition (MCOP No. 36/2025) from the Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram, dated February 25, 2026, concerning a two-wheeler accident that occurred on January 29, 2023. The claimant (witness Muthukumari) testified that her son Arun died in the accident caused by a vehicle collision, and she filed a compensation claim. The court examined documentary evidence including the FIR, post-mortem report, death certificate, vehicle inspection report, and employment certificate. The court admitted the second defendant's cross-examination arguments and dismissed the petition, ruling that the case is not maintainable due to a prior compensation claim (MCOP No. 2786/2023) filed in Chennai City Small Causes Court for the same incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts