Sathiyaraj vs Kaliyammal — 132/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1to6,261. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 01-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM010056452024

Filing Number

703/2024

Filing Date

30-Oct-2024

Registration No

132/2024

Registration Date

30-Oct-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1to6,261

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sathiyaraj

    Adv. Thiru. B.Sundararajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kaliyammal

  2. 2.Devi

  3. 3.Shanmuga Kani

  4. 4.Kalaiyarasi

  5. 5.Minor,Kaviyarasan, through its power agent, Kalaiyarasi

  6. 6.Minor.Danish, through its power agent, Kalaiyarasi

  7. 7.Geetharani

  8. 8.Mallika

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    This is a Tamil-language court order from OS. 8/2015 dated 24.03.2026 from Ramanathapuram district court. The order documents cross-examination testimony of a defendant regarding property disputes, inheritance matters, and claims involving ancestral property sharing. The judge's order (at the end) affirms that defendants must pay Rs. 28 lakhs to plaintiffs for their share of ancestral property according to Islamic inheritance law, with the judge finding the defendants' contradictory statements regarding gifts and wills unsubstantiated. The case involves competing claims over property succession and partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  11. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  12. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  13. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  14. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  15. 02-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Additional District Judge

  16. 24-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Judge

  17. 17-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Judge

  18. 29-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Judge

  19. 09-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  20. 07-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  21. 11-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  22. 19-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  23. 16-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  24. 03-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  25. 21-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  26. 29-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  27. 26-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  28. 27-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  29. 30-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  30. 10-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  31. 18-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  32. 28-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  33. 30-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 30-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 132/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil-language court order from OS. 8/2015 dated 24.03.2026 from Ramanathapuram district court. The order documents cross-examination testimony of a defendant regarding property disputes, inheritance matters, and claims involving ancestral property sharing. The judge's order (at the end) affirms that defendants must pay Rs. 28 lakhs to plaintiffs for their share of ancestral property according to Islamic inheritance law, with the judge finding the defendants' contradictory statements regarding gifts and wills unsubstantiated. The case involves competing claims over property succession and partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case