Sathiyaraj vs Kaliyammal — 132/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1to6,261. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM010056452024

Evidence

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

Filing Number

703/2024

Filing Date

30-10-2024

Registration No

132/2024

Registration Date

30-10-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1to6,261
Ia/5/2026 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section SathiyarajKaliyammal

Petitioner(s)

Sathiyaraj

Adv. Thiru. B.Sundararajan

Respondent(s)

Kaliyammal

Devi

Shanmuga Kani

Kalaiyarasi

Minor,Kaviyarasan, through its power agent, Kalaiyarasi

Minor.Danish, through its power agent, Kalaiyarasi

Geetharani

Mallika

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District Judge

28-04-2026

Evidence

21-04-2026

Evidence

16-04-2026

Evidence

07-04-2026

Evidence

26-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

24-03-2026
Copy of deposition

This is a Tamil-language court order from OS. 8/2015 dated 24.03.2026 from Ramanathapuram district court. The order documents cross-examination testimony of a defendant regarding property disputes, inheritance matters, and claims involving ancestral property sharing. The judge's order (at the end) affirms that defendants must pay Rs. 28 lakhs to plaintiffs for their share of ancestral property according to Islamic inheritance law, with the judge finding the defendants' contradictory statements regarding gifts and wills unsubstantiated. The case involves competing claims over property succession and partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil-language court order from OS. 8/2015 dated 24.03.2026 from Ramanathapuram district court. The order documents cross-examination testimony of a defendant regarding property disputes, inheritance matters, and claims involving ancestral property sharing. The judge's order (at the end) affirms that defendants must pay Rs. 28 lakhs to plaintiffs for their share of ancestral property according to Islamic inheritance law, with the judge finding the defendants' contradictory statements regarding gifts and wills unsubstantiated. The case involves competing claims over property succession and partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case