Rajendran vs Muniyayi @ Muniyammal — 90/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM010053292023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
697/2023
Filing Date
25-09-2023
Registration No
90/2023
Registration Date
25-09-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendran
Adv. Thiru. P. Thirumalaikumar
Respondent(s)
Muniyayi @ Muniyammal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. No. 90/2023, Primary District Court, Ramanathapuram Date: 07.02.2026 Outcome: The court completed the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff's witness (PW-1, Sri. Venkateshwaran) on the disputed "Thava" property. The court recorded detailed testimony regarding property boundaries, survey numbers, ancestral inheritance details, and land partition among the heirs of Raman Nadan. The court accepted the witness's testimony regarding the plaintiff's rightful ownership of the property and admitted relevant documentary evidence (deeds dated 09.04.2008 and 27.05.2010, and Patta No. 3015). No further cross-examination was required, and the case proceeded toward conclusion with the plaintiff's evidence accepted as valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. No. 90/2023, Primary District Court, Ramanathapuram Date: 07.02.2026 Outcome: The court completed the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff's witness (PW-1, Sri. Venkateshwaran) on the disputed "Thava" property. The court recorded detailed testimony regarding property boundaries, survey numbers, ancestral inheritance details, and land partition among the heirs of Raman Nadan. The court accepted the witness's testimony regarding the plaintiff's rightful ownership of the property and admitted relevant documentary evidence (deeds dated 09.04.2008 and 27.05.2010, and Patta No. 3015). No further cross-examination was required, and the case proceeded toward conclusion with the plaintiff's evidence accepted as valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts