Sivaranjani vs Raja kili — 175/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,163B,166,182A. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNRM010049002024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
19-09-2024
Filing Number
620/2024
Filing Date
20-09-2024
Registration No
175/2024
Registration Date
27-09-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
2-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivaranjani
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Nithiya
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Madhubala
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Ajith Kumar
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Manikandan
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Respondent(s)
Raja kili
Assistant legal manager, MAGMA HDI general insurance co Ltd, Chennai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: In this motor accident compensation petition (MCOP 175/2024) dated 02.09.2025, the Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram court examined cross-examination statements and rejected various contentions of the petitioners regarding dependency, accident circumstances, and insurance liability. The court dismissed the petition against the second respondent (insurance company) and upheld that the insurance company is not liable to pay compensation due to policy violations by the vehicle operator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: In this motor accident compensation petition (MCOP 175/2024) dated 02.09.2025, the Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram court examined cross-examination statements and rejected various contentions of the petitioners regarding dependency, accident circumstances, and insurance liability. The court dismissed the petition against the second respondent (insurance company) and upheld that the insurance company is not liable to pay compensation due to policy violations by the vehicle operator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts