Sivaranjani vs Raja kili — 175/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,163B,166,182A. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNRM010049002024
e-Filing Number
19-09-2024
Filing Number
620/2024
Filing Date
20-Sep-2024
Registration No
175/2024
Registration Date
27-Sep-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
2-Additional District Judge
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sivaranjani
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
-
2.Nithiya
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
-
3.Madhubala
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
-
4.Ajith Kumar
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
-
5.Manikandan
Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raja kili
-
2.Assistant legal manager, MAGMA HDI general insurance co Ltd, Chennai
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
02-Sep-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
02-Sep-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
SUMMARY: In this motor accident compensation petition (MCOP 175/2024) dated 02.09.2025, the Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram court examined cross-examination statements and rejected various contentions of the petitioners regarding dependency, accident circumstances, and insurance liability. The court dismissed the petition against the second respondent (insurance company) and upheld that the insurance company is not liable to pay compensation due to policy violations by the vehicle operator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
08-Jul-2025
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
25-Nov-2024
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 175/2024
SUMMARY: In this motor accident compensation petition (MCOP 175/2024) dated 02.09.2025, the Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram court examined cross-examination statements and rejected various contentions of the petitioners regarding dependency, accident circumstances, and insurance liability. The court dismissed the petition against the second respondent (insurance company) and upheld that the insurance company is not liable to pay compensation due to policy violations by the vehicle operator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts