LATCHIYAVATHII vs SENTHILKUMAR — 42/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 11. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNRM010047342024

e-Filing Number

30-08-2024

Filing Number

580/2024

Filing Date

13-Sep-2024

Registration No

42/2024

Registration Date

05-Dec-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LATCHIYAVATHII

    Adv. P.Venkatesan P.Venkatesan

  2. 2.PAPPA

    Adv. P.Venkatesan P.Venkatesan

  3. 3.KAVITHA

    Adv. P.Venkatesan P.Venkatesan

  4. 4.PALANI MURUGAN

    Adv. P.Venkatesan P.Venkatesan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SENTHILKUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

    Principal District Judge

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal District Judge of Ramanathapuram allowed the execution petition and ordered the arrest of the judgment debtor Senthilkumar for non-payment of a Rs. 3,66,000 compensation award. The court held that an ex parte award remains executable unless formally set aside, and found that the respondent has sufficient means but purposely avoided payment, satisfying the requirements for arrest and civil prison detention by 09.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  12. 21-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  15. 23-Oct-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  16. 23-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  17. 15-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  20. 03-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  22. 17-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  23. 25-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  24. 06-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  25. 24-Apr-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  26. 03-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  27. 13-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  28. 13-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  29. 09-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  30. 05-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 13-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Judge of Ramanathapuram allowed the execution petition and ordered the arrest of the judgment debtor Senthilkumar for non-payment of a Rs. 3,66,000 compensation award. The court held that an ex parte award remains executable unless formally set aside, and found that the respondent has sufficient means but purposely avoided payment, satisfying the requirements for arrest and civil prison detention by 09.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case