Rengarajan S/o. Late. Venugopal vs Suseendhran S/o. Late. Govindharajan — 100/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7, Rule1,26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM010041552022
Filing Number
612/2022
Filing Date
15-Sep-2022
Registration No
100/2022
Registration Date
29-Nov-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
2-Additional District Judge
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rengarajan S/o. Late. Venugopal
Adv. Thiru. C.Ravichandran
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suseendhran S/o. Late. Govindharajan
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: OS. 100/2022 | Date: 22.04.2026 | Court: District Court, Ramanathapuram (Tamil Nadu) This is a cross-examination proceeding in a property dispute involving partition of ancestral properties and commercial establishments between family members. The court examined the defendant's testimony regarding shared ownership of properties (Davah 1-11), a bookstore business (Arunaa Bookstore), and an agreement (Exhibit 25) allegedly settling the property division. The court found several contradictions in the defendant's statements regarding the cash payment of ₹7 lakhs, the execution of the settlement document, and claims about exclusive possession of properties. The court rejected the defendant's denials and found that the defendant had received the ₹7 lakhs in cash and benefited from the settlement agreement, thereby declining to grant the reliefs sought by the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Mediation
Additional District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Mediation
Additional District Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Await Reports
Additional District Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
29-Aug-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
20-Aug-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
14-Aug-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
01-Aug-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
16-Jul-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
29-Apr-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
25-Mar-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
13-Mar-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
01-Mar-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
16-Feb-2024
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
11-Jan-2024
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
12-Dec-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
03-Nov-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
03-Oct-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
01-Sep-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
20-Jul-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
03-Jul-2023
Appearance
Additional District Judge
-
12-Jun-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
05-Jun-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
19-Apr-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
10-Apr-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
29-Mar-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
20-Mar-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
27-Feb-2023
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
20-Feb-2023
Issues
Additional District Judge
-
15-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
03-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
20-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
05-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
29-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 100/2022
Court Order Summary Case: OS. 100/2022 | Date: 22.04.2026 | Court: District Court, Ramanathapuram (Tamil Nadu) This is a cross-examination proceeding in a property dispute involving partition of ancestral properties and commercial establishments between family members. The court examined the defendant's testimony regarding shared ownership of properties (Davah 1-11), a bookstore business (Arunaa Bookstore), and an agreement (Exhibit 25) allegedly settling the property division. The court found several contradictions in the defendant's statements regarding the cash payment of ₹7 lakhs, the execution of the settlement document, and claims about exclusive possession of properties. The court rejected the defendant's denials and found that the defendant had received the ₹7 lakhs in cash and benefited from the settlement agreement, thereby declining to grant the reliefs sought by the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts