NABEES vs Inspector of police — 32/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition

CNR: TNRM010038932025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-11-2025

Filing Number

3148/2025

Filing Date

18-11-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

19-11-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438(2)

Petitioner(s)

NABEES

Adv. Sheik Ibrahim SJ

Respondent(s)

Inspector of police

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Orders

04-03-2026

Enquiry

03-03-2026

Enquiry

25-02-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the lower court's order denying interim custody of a seized Hyundai vehicle to its owner Nabees. The court found that the vehicle was not directly involved in the offense and unnecessary retention would cause deterioration, relying on the Supreme Court precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The vehicle was ordered returned to the petitioner on interim custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 2,00,000 bond, photographic documentation, and an undertaking not to transfer or alienate the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram allowed the criminal revision petition and set aside the lower court's order denying interim custody of a seized Hyundai vehicle to its owner Nabees. The court found that the vehicle was not directly involved in the offense and unnecessary retention would cause deterioration, relying on the Supreme Court precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The vehicle was ordered returned to the petitioner on interim custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 2,00,000 bond, photographic documentation, and an undertaking not to transfer or alienate the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case