Banumathi vs Gurusamy — 84/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNRM010037032025
e-Filing Number
29-08-2025
Filing Number
832/2025
Filing Date
03-Nov-2025
Registration No
84/2025
Registration Date
03-Nov-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Banumathi
Adv. Sundarrajan B
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gurusamy
-
2.Shanmugam
-
3.Amaravathi
-
4.Revathi
-
5.Muthulakshmi
-
6.Santhi
-
7.Meenambal
-
8.Kaleeswari
-
9.Chithiraiselvi
-
10.Kalpana
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Primary District Court of Ramanathapuram allowed a petition to transfer case O.S.No.169/2023 from the District Civil Court to the Sub-Court and consolidate it with O.S.No.75/2024 for joint trial. The court reasoned that both cases involve similar disputes regarding property partition among the same parties, and conducting separate trials in different courts risked conflicting judgments, necessitating consolidation under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code to ensure justice and prevent hardship to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 84/2025
Summary The Primary District Court of Ramanathapuram allowed a petition to transfer case O.S.No.169/2023 from the District Civil Court to the Sub-Court and consolidate it with O.S.No.75/2024 for joint trial. The court reasoned that both cases involve similar disputes regarding property partition among the same parties, and conducting separate trials in different courts risked conflicting judgments, necessitating consolidation under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code to ensure justice and prevent hardship to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts