Gandhi vs Rajendran — 167/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1,26. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM010032562025

Filing Number

700/2025

Filing Date

19-Sep-2025

Registration No

167/2025

Registration Date

06-Oct-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1,26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gandhi

    Adv. Thiru. S.Senthilkumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajendran

  2. 2.Govindaraj

  3. 3.Subramani

  4. 4.Govindammal

  5. 5.Selvaraj

  6. 6.Muneeswari

  7. 7.Muthulakshmi

  8. 8.Devakumar

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by Devakumar (8th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC to set aside an ex-parte order passed against him is allowed. The court found that the defendant had received a confused summons regarding the court's identity, appeared through counsel after being set ex-parte, and had a good defense to offer; therefore, no serious prejudice would result to the plaintiff if the ex-parte order were set aside. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  10. 27-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Judge

  11. 06-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 19-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 167/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Devakumar (8th defendant) under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC to set aside an ex-parte order passed against him is allowed. The court found that the defendant had received a confused summons regarding the court's identity, appeared through counsel after being set ex-parte, and had a good defense to offer; therefore, no serious prejudice would result to the plaintiff if the ex-parte order were set aside. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case